| |
 |
Our
Customers - Delta Biotechnology |
Delta
Biotechnology Limited was founded in Nottingham in 1984 as a pioneer
business, based on yeast technology, in protein engineering and
the production of biopharmaceuticals. The company has a proven track
record in working with collaborative partners in the development
and manufacture of new therapies. Delta has ongoing development
collaborations with a number of leading global pharmaceutical companies,
maintaining partnerships in the US, Europe and Japan.
It
has demonstrable success in supporting out-licensing and technology
transfer in, amongst others:-
· Therapeutic recombinant proteins
· Vaccines (both animal and human)
· Fusion proteins
· Medical device applications
|
|
Delta offers a breadth and depth of expertise to its biotechnology
and pharmaceutical partners, from pre-clinical research to world-class,
large-scale fermentation-based manufacturing with comprehensive regulatory
support. Recently, Delta secured the prestigious Queen's Award for
Enterprise for its business performance based on increased export
earnings mainly for Recombumin (recombinant human albumin), a fully
synthetic version of the plasma-derived protein.
For a number of years, the company had used a basic scheduling methodology
complemented by a commonly used project management software package
dating back to the early 90s.
Back in 2000 the company decided to radically overhaul its scheduling
infrastructure. This is when Delta first made contact with Preactor
and systems integrator Resource Management Systems (RMS).
Historic
problems
Project Manager Mark Wilson provided the background. "We had
developed a simple production schedule for basic tasks involving a
manufacturing batch comprising between 100 and 200 jobs. To use this
schedule on a day-to-day basis was a simple process and worked fairly
well. However, scheduling was pretty much limited to our core manufacturing
shift teams which work on a 24/7 operation. What we really wanted
was to integrate other functions, namely the dispensary staff, the
final product handling staff, the engineering staff, and the quality
control staff into some aspects of our scheduling IT routine".
| "For
us, the package we were using had limitations in its capacity
to deal with other groups working on various shift rotas. In
addition we wanted to plan long-term to look as much as a year
ahead. At this point, the program became impossibly large and
tended to crash a great deal." |
 |
In
the late 1990s, Wilson and his team developed a system of 'nested'
projects, so Delta could schedule one batch after another. "This
proved to be a worthwhile exercise because it focused our minds on
how we would want our ideal IT scheduling system to be, which we subsequently
put into practice when we sourced Preactor APS and began its customisation
with RMS. However, because we were using, this 'nesting' practice
it stretched the capacity of the PC, which made it rather slow to
open and close."
The Solution
The decision was therefore taken to look for a software package that
could deal effectively with higher levels of scheduling complexity,
something with a greater capacity and faster operating speed.
"We had heard favourable things about Preactor APS and attended
a demonstration at a show at the NEC in Birmingham back in 2000,"
said Wilson. "We then looked for alternatives, but frankly we
couldn't find any other product that could match Preactor's flexibility.
The APS package was reasonably priced, and it could clearly do everything
we wanted our previous package to do, with fewer glitches and a quicker
start-up time. Delta sourced Preactor APS via RMS in 2000. The company
purchased a single Preactor APS licence. The system is normally kept
open by the shift supervisor who can update throughout the day as
required. The company also has three Preactor viewer licences.
Implementation
and Customisation
Delta does not employ a full-time production scheduler. Scheduling
responsibilities are shared between Wilson, the Production Manager
and the shift supervisors who work a 24/7 rota.
As regards implementation, Delta was hoping to conduct most of the
work, including system customisation, in-house, supported by RMS staff.
In practice, it also called on the services of a consultant from Foster
Wheeler Energy Limited (FWEL) for around three weeks.
"This was mainly a resource issue," said Wilson. "At
this time my services were largely focused elsewhere and I simply
couldn't dedicate as much time as I would have liked to discuss customisation
issues with RMS. In the early stages, the FWEL scheduling and IT specialist
did quite a bit of work with RMS to customise the software to our
specific requirements. For example, one of the biggest benefits of
our bespoke version of Preactor APS is how, if we fail to meet any
specified time criteria regarding any particular job, a box appears
on the screen and points out which time frame was not achieved and
by how long it was missed."
Most
of the customisation was done by RMS at its headquarters in Mexborough,
South Yorkshire. However, RMS staff also visited Delta on many occasions,
particularly when Wilson wished to explain aspects of further bespoke
work that Delta wanted to implement.
"From time to time it's easier to explain things face to face,
and by drawings, rather than trying to explain things via email,"
said Wilson. "This method has worked very well, and RMS staff
have been very helpful and easy to work with throughout."
Go
Live
The system went live in 2002. However, the customisation remains
an ongoing process as Delta becomes aware of additional enhancements
that could be made. "As we think of better ways to use
the system we suggest changes to RMS, so it is very much a rolling
evolution with Preactor APS," said Wilson. |
 |
"We started with the concept that we wouldn't cover anything
outside the core manufacturing routines managed by our shift teams.
To do this we needed the ability to replicate a standard production
batch a number of times. This can involve anything from 200 to 500
tasks, depending on exactly how the batch is being manufactured. So
we created a database system where we could produce what we call a
phase of operation".
"In reality it doesn't comprise frameworks for single batches,
but overlaps one batch into another. And we created a library of phases,
which initially and fairly simplistically we could stitch together
as a beginning, an end and many middles, on the theory that all middles
would be identical. We got this system up and running, and very quickly
learned one or two lessons about the difference between Preactor and
our Project Management software".
"Preactor APS could 'think' and basically put things where we
told it to. The biggest asset of Preactor APS is that, having built
the structure it will carry out the operation of working out the optimum
way of getting the jobs done. Whereas all we could do with the Project
Management system was 'move time', forwards or backwards."
Wilson cited another
advantage of Preactor APS as its ability to use secondary constraints
to avoid scheduling use of the same piece of equipment simultaneously.
"This means we can move a single job and leave Preactor APS to
re-arrange the rest of the schedule," he explained. "On
our package, if you moved a single job you had to look at everything
that clashed and move those jobs, then look at everything again."
Wilson also realised that Delta rarely had job runs that were totally
identical. "To keep things simple, our Preactor system has 20
working slots for each manufacturing campaign. And into these slots
we can put the details of any manufacturing phase we wish."
Benefits
Since implementation of Preactor APS, Delta has recognised a number
of key benefits.
"It's a great visual tool," said Wilson. "And it's
so quick that I can make changes to the schedule bit by bit within
seconds rather than waiting until I had, say, ten changes to the schedule
then load the lot at once."
Wilson also recognises the benefits of Preactor's 'What if' scenarios.
"It's very convenient to be able to come up with a theoretical
schedule and check its effectiveness without actually saving the data
as a real schedule."
In addition, Wilson drew attention to Preactor's ease of backup. "The
fact that we can back up our data on Preactor within around two minutes
means there is little excuse not to regularly go through the process
at least once a week."
The Future
Over the next two years, Wilson plans to include engineering shut-down
scheduling within Preactor.
"At the moment the Engineering Department schedules its maintenance
shut-downs independently. However, our Engineering department currently
lacks the ability to say this is the existing schedule, now I want
to change it or add things to it. At the moment, Engineering builds
a campaign &then puts it on the planning board. Then if the department
is half way through & wants to re-build, it either loses the history
or has to put the history on using the change date function in, then
move it around to get it in about the right place. Once Engineering
is brought on stream with Preactor we won't have such problems &
will have a fully integrated scheduling tool for manufacturing operations."
Mike Novels, Managing Director of Preactor, said of the implementation:
"I was particularly struck how the system has evolved over a
period of time and how the footprint of Preactor has gradually expanded
to cover a much wider part of the business. It's a very impressive
application."
Don Dyas of RMS, added: "The Delta Biotech story is a perfect
example of how Preactor can evolve in line with the customer's individual
requirements. Major benefits have already been realised by Delta Biotech
since utilising Preactor. These benefits have more than justified
the original decision to choose the software solution. Significantly
though, Mark and his team are aware that further improvement is always
possible, and as such they will no doubt continue to consult RMS regarding
further enhancements as required."
|