| |
 |
Our
Customers - Sandvik Mining & Construction |
Preactor
provides platform for growth for Sandvik Mining & Construction
Sandvik
Mining and Construction’s facility in Alachua, Florida, is
part of the Sandvik group of companies and specialises in the assembly
of drill rigs for surface mining. The company’s assembly unit
in Alachua,
employs over 200 people, with 150 of these used in the production
of the wide variety of drill rigs for supply throughout the world.
With key markets including Australia, South Africa, and the US the
Alachua facility needs to have its assembly processes as streamlined
as possible. When the facility needed computerised scheduling to
assist this, it found a firm foundation to build on with Preactor
300 FCS and system implementer RMS.
The
world of drill rig assembly presents many business challenges
which start with the very nature of the product itself. With
each rig comprising over 1500 individual parts and sub-assemblies,
co-ordinating the flow of materials becomes a mission critical
requirement. In addition to the complexity of each rig, the
sheer range of possible permutations available also places heavy
demands on the company.
|
|
"Thomas
Duffaut is Vice President Supply Surface Mining expands on some of
these challenges. “Given the bespoke nature of the majority
of our products, it is essential to accurately forecast appropriate
stock levels of a continuously flexible range of parts. Moreover,
because we work on a cell manufacturing basis, any problems or assembly
bottlenecks progressively get more challenging the further the order
completes. And with each rig taking on average some months to fully
assemble, the effects can be cumulative across many different orders.
We are always facing the possibility of a cell being either left empty
or having to deal with an overcapacity of work.” In additional
to material resource problems, the assembly plant also faces considerable
human resource challenges.
| Duffaut
again, “Some of most acute planning and scheduling difficulties
come at the end of the process, specifically with respect to
the Testing and Painting stages. Unlike the other cells involved
in the assembly process where much of the human skill sets are
interchangeable, these two stages require very specific skills.
Therefore it’s paramount to ensure that our human resources
with these skills are being used in a most effective and efficient
manner and not being tied up elsewhere in the assembly process.” |
|
As if this wasn’t enough, the Alachua facility face additional
challenges resulting from assembling such a complex end product and
therefore having to work with so many suppliers. Late delivery is
a constant threat to the overall flow of a job throughout the facility,
as is the very real possibility of customers changing rig specifications
after the job has commenced. In a like manner, at times the company
will commence a job
building to order from forecast, only to find that again, specifications
change. As Duffaut realistically summarises, “It is simply a
part of the industry we operate in, the best you can do is manage
it, and manage it effectively.”
In 2004, the Alachua plant attempted to make use of a widely used
commercial project planning software to help with its planning and
scheduling issues. From the outset it was clear that this software
was very complex to use, not just from a strategic solution perspective,
but also from the perspective of the average user who would have to
make use of the system. As Duffaut remarks, “It demanded a lot
of IT and system knowledge, which is not something you’d find
in the average user.” In addition to the complexity, there was
not a lot of flexibility in the product or any attempted solutions
derived from the product. All in all it was clear that there was not
a good fit.
In early 2005 Duffaut therefore began conducting some research into
alternative computerised planning and scheduling solutions which led
them to a number of contenders, including Preactor from RMS. Whereas
the solutions all showed some potential, what really stood out for
Sandvik was RMS’ much more service-oriented approach in comparison
to the other companies. As he makes clear, “In addition to being
much more knowledgeable about its solution, they were much more willing
to work with us, and also showed a strong understanding of our industry
and our requirements.
Sandvik placed an order with RMS for a Preactor 300 FCS system in
July 2005 and commenced on an ambitious implementation timetable.
This involved Warren Roberts from RMS spending a number of days with
all key planning and stakeholders in Alachua. RMS’ wider IT
system skills were used to provide the required integration with Sandvik’s
AS400 based System 21 ERP system which in turn, provided an extra
benefit because it meant that there was very little demand put on
its own internal IT resources. A period of parallel running for a
month went smoothly with RMS providing any final fine tuning that
was required. The system went live 2 months after the implementation
began. Duffaut is convinced the speed and smoothness came from RMS’
attitude to working with the people in Alachua. “At every level,
RMS clearly wanted to work as fully as possible with us. Even during
the parallel running, any minor issue we had was sorted out straight
away.
Since using Preactor, the Alachua plant has noticed a number of major
benefits although these are hard to quantify for two reasons. Firstly,
given the previous lack of visibility in the company concerning its
planning and scheduling, there was very little to measure against
as a definitive benchmark. Secondly, the plant had also undertaken
a whole range of process changes since Preactor has been installed.
Duffaut takes this further. “We have not just changed our processes
because of Preactor, Preactor has actually enabled us
change our processes in ways that have provided additional efficiency
and effectiveness. We wouldn’t have been able to make these
changes without the control and visibility that Preactor provides
us with.”
| In
terms of visibility, the Alachua production planning group now
has much greater accuracy in terms of what is happening across
all jobs live within the factory. It also can react much more
quickly to any late deliveries or changes in specifications,
with Preactor’s “what-if” scenarios providing
the planners with allows the company to be deliver much greater
accuracy in terms of delivery times. The ability to be much
more proactive in terms of communicating with customers about
how their job is progressing has also proved to be very helpful
in managing customer expectations and ultimately keeping customer
satisfaction levels to a high level. Preactor’s visibility
has also proved very useful to Alachua’s supply group
because it is now much easier to compare projected forecasts
with what is actually happening within the production facility,
and to make adjustments accordingly. |
|
Preactor has also helped improve the factory’s human resource
scheduling challenges, as Duffaut explains. “Whilst ensuring
that the most skilled workers are scheduled to maximum effectiveness
will always be a challenge, with Preactor we now have a much smoother
flow of drill rig assemblies into the specialist cells which makes
scheduling the appropriate personnel that much easier.“ He cites
an example of overtime use to illustrate this. “Prior to Preactor,
we might have to notify people 5 minutes before the end of shift that
they may need to do overtime. This was far from satisfactory. Now
however, we can ask a week in advance which not only smoothes the
work flow, but keeps the workers much happier and at ease.”
As for the future, Duffaut’s main aim is to work with RMS to
develop some of the more complex elements of reporting, specifically
to publishing web schedules around the facility via the company’s
intranet. As for Preactor and RMS, Duffaut has no doubts of their
worth to Sandvik. “The whole experience has been a very positive
one. Both Preactor and RMS have been extremely flexible and fulfilled
everything promised.” |