| |
 |
Our
Customers - Silvergate Plastics |
Preactor
enables Silvergate Plastics to fulfil unique business strategy
Silvergate Plastics, established in 1985 and purchased in 1997 by
British Vita, is a specialist provider of colour matched polymer
solutions to end users both inside and outside the Vita group.
Now part of the Vita Thermoplastic Compound Division, the
company supplies solid colour concentrates for plastics in
the form of pellets that provide absolute consistency of colour,
when these are later processed by customers into brand sensitive,
final polymer products such as packaging, films, and mouldings.
With 20 million possible colour permutations and where the
customer is always right, there is no margin for error. When
Silvergate began its evolution towards an automated planning
and scheduling solution, it found the perfect match in Preactor.
|
|
| With
a product range in excess of 40,000 live colours, Silvergate
operates on a 100% Make to Order basis, handling an average
of 1000 orders per month ranging in size from 2 kilograms to
over 30 tonnes. The company also is totally customer-centric,
believing in a philosophy of getting it right, first time, and
exceeding customer requirements. In a business context of every
decreasing lead times and ever increasing flexibility, Silvergate
has a unique attitude towards delivery times: it doesn’t
specify any. Tony Bestall is Business Manager at Silvergate
Plastics and VTC Synco in Italy and he explains how and why.
“Historically we operated on a 5-7 day lead time with
a premium service where we provided an absolute guarantee to
deliver in either 48 or 72 hours. If we didn’t, we would
credit back to the customer from 50 to 100% of the order value.
This generated a sense of trust with our customers that they
knew they could rely on us.” |
|
He continues, “We all know that most companies will do whatever
it takes to keep delivery promises to its leading customers, with
this usually at the expense of the smaller customers. We took a deliberate
decision that we would treat all our customers equally, and meet the
delivery times they themselves specify.” Amazingly, this has
not created an unworkable situation with every customer demanding
their order tomorrow. Bestall sees this as a result of the trust Silvergate
has earned from its customers. “Because they know we will deliver
when necessary, if a customer doesn’t need an order for 2 weeks,
they will say so. If they need it by tomorrow, they’ll say so.
Either way, we will make that delivery.”
Perhaps surprisingly, the most pressing business challenge that Silvergate
faces is the sheer pace of business that the company has to deal with,
processing 1000 orders per month, all of which can have entirely variable
delivery dates. This is exacerbated by the MTO nature of the business
that means the company carries no finished goods stock. Visibility
is critical; especially the means to accurately know how any job is
progressing at any one time. As Bestall remarks, “Nothing’s
static, everything’s always changing, and keeping track of what’s
happening, where and when can be a full time job.”
| A
full time job is precisely what the planning and scheduling
used to be before Silvergate invested in Preactor. It was a
completely manual process which began with moving coloured plaques
around a large rubber mat. These would be shuffled around, along
with the accompanying paperwork to get a rough working schedule,
which would then be typed into a spreadsheet. Once complete,
the spreadsheet would be photocopied and manually distributed
around the production facility. Bestall understates the point
when he says, “It wasn’t very efficient, and to
make matters worse, it would be out of date within 5 minutes
as soon as the next order came in.” |
 |
It
was Bestall’s appointment as Business Manager that brought about
the beginnings of change at Silvergate. “We had to do something
because we couldn’t adopt the manufacturing and sales strategy
that we wanted without changing how we did our planning and scheduling.”
The first step on this evolutionary journey was a drive to improve
internal business processes by first mapping them accurately. This
led to Bestall identifying 30 individual steps to process an order
and a total of up to 60 steps from receipt of an order through to
the order being delivered. This equated to 8 hours of time and represented
a major point of waste within the company.
Analysing these tasks soon identified a number of non essential steps
which were quickly removed. Other important but repetitive tasks were
identified and it was at this time that Bestall became aware of a
potential automated planning and scheduling tool called Preactor running
elsewhere within the Vita group. This led to initial discussions with
Preactor Solution Provider RMS about the possibilities of using Preactor
at Silvergate. In addition to RMS showing a genuine understanding
of Silvergate’s business requirements, it also arranged for
Bestall to see the product working in a live context in a similar
business situation.
Convinced by this, and by the fact that both RMS and Preactor were
trusted elsewhere within the Vita group, Silvergate invested in a
Preactor 200 FCS system. Bestall is typically down to earth when he
explains his reasons why. “We knew it wouldn’t fall over,
and our initial plans were to simply use Preactor as a means of reducing
the number of spreadsheets in our business processes and by doing
so, create a quicker and more accurate way of communicating information
to the shop floor.”
Implementation primarily consisted of 6 days of consultation where
Silvergate’s Bernard Nolan worked with RMS’s Warren Roberts
to work out the protocols of information exchange between Preactor
and Silvergate’s business management system, an internal group
system called Vita soft. This would be a key step in reducing the
significant paper chase that hindered Silvergate’s operating
efficiency. It also inolved a significant amount of work in setting
up the operating parameters required for each product, including Order
References, Product References, Customer References, Quantity, Colour
Group, Raw Material Requirements etc.
After 9 months of development and tuning, the system went live in
October 2005. Nolan describes how the system worked at this stage.
“We deliberately wanted to control each step so someone pressed
a button to send information from Vitasoft to Preactor. Someone then
had to press a button in Preactor to read the information and make
any adjustments to the generated schedule. Once the schedule had been
finalised, the process happened in reverse, with someone manually
sending the schedule back to Vitasoft and someone manually receiving
it back into Vitasoft.”
Whilst looking quite a manual process, Nolan is quick to point out
that Silvergate wasn’t looking to fully automate the system
at this stage. “We deliberately set about using Preactor as
a means of evolution, not revolution. We wanted to enable our planners
to do their job more efficiently and effectively. We also knew that
we had a large cultural change to effect, both in terms of getting
people to trust a piece of software as opposed to their own experience
or gut feeling. This shift is essential because people often plan
according to what they want to make, whereas we needed to plan purely
according to our customer requirements.”
The benefits were noticeable right away, most noticeably in the area
of increased visibility. Silvergate could now see all the orders in
the system in real time, and how each was progressing. When a new
order was received, the impact of this could be seen, and Preactor
could re-order the schedule right away as required. The time savings
were also significant as the company moved from a service level of
79% for delivering in full and on time with a 5-7 day lead time, to
96-99% in full and on time, with no lead time. This demonstrable improvement
also helped encourage a greater sense of trust in the system about
what needed to be made, and when. As Bestall observes, “It helped
expose the difference between what people thought was required, and
what actually was required in order to meet our customer service levels.”
Another benefit directly resulting from the time savings brought about
by Preactor was the ability to remove the need for 1 of the 3 full
time planners.
| A
commitment to ongoing continuous improvement didn’t let
the system remain as it was, in spite of the impressive benefits
already achieved. The company was now looking at ways of automatically
updating the schedule in real time whenever an order came in
either directly from a customer or from within the company,
with the updated schedule being pushed out to the shop floor.
The existing P200 couldn’t cope with the levels of automation
required so Silvergate investigated the Preactor APS 400 system,
again from RMS. Nolan worked with RMS to identify the information
exchange protocols and an ambitious go live date of late July
2006 was set. It was also recognised that this would be a completion
to the cultural change already achieved because people would
have to trust completely in the system. A standalone advanced
planning and scheduling system on a separate PC allowed some
final fine tuning before the main system went live, successfully,
and on time. |
|
| Both
Nolan and Bestall recall the go-live very clearly, both describing
it in terms of “taking their hands off the system for
the first time”, with Bestall going on to describe “feeling
a huge weight lift from my shoulders.” Now Silvergate
has a system which automatically updates when a new order is
received with this information being pushed immediately to the
shop floor via the company’s intranet to be displayed
either on a monitor or via a large plasma screen. This has freed
up the planner’s time considerably, which prior to moving
to Preactor APS 400, represented between 30 and 50% of the planners
total work load. Now they are able to be much more actively
involved in the actual production management side of the business
which is bringing further efficiency benefits. |
 |
Silvergate has ambitious plans for the future in the ongoing evolution
of its Preactor APS system. These includes a move to a total hands
off, paper free scheduling process within the company, and extending
the use of Preactor APS 400 into like businesses across a number of
other sites.. Plans are already in process of implementing Preactor
in Silvergate’s Italian plant and then running the planning
and scheduling of the plant remotely from the UK. As Bestall concludes,
“It is our passion and commitment to delivering what our customers
want, when they want it, which drives our business. In addition to
continually reviewing our nternal business processes, Preactor has
become an integral part of our ability to achieve our business model.”
|